The Lottery and Its Critics
Lottery is a form of gambling that involves the drawing of lots to determine ownership or other rights. The practice is of ancient origin, with references in the Bible and many other early documents. More recently, it has been used to raise money for towns, wars, colleges, and public-works projects. Currently, a number of states conduct state lotteries. While lottery proceeds are usually viewed as an important source of funding for the state, critics point to problems including regressive effects on lower-income communities and compulsive gamblers. In addition, the way in which lotteries are run often appears to be at cross-purposes with other state policy objectives.
One issue is that the lottery focuses primarily on selling chances to win a prize of high value, even though skill can be involved in some games. The promotion of lottery participation, which is done through television, radio, and billboards, appeals mainly to the desire to become wealthy quickly. This is a powerful motivation, and a central feature of the lottery’s success, especially in times of economic stress.
The second issue is that lotteries are designed to operate as a business and to maximize profits, rather than to serve the needs of the state or the general public. This is a serious problem because it encourages an unhealthy attitude toward gambling and is aimed primarily at low-income communities, the most likely group to be affected by its negative impacts. As a business, the lottery must make decisions about the amount of the prizes to be offered and the frequency of them, how much to spend on prizes, and what percentage of ticket sales should go as revenue or profit to the organization or sponsors.
These decisions are made in a context where public opinion is very favorable towards lotteries and the revenues that they generate for the state. This positive perception has been sustained over time, even though studies have shown that lottery participation is less favorable among younger people and the poor. In fact, the ten states that have lotteries have very similar distributions of per capita spending between low-income and non-low-income communities.
Lottery advocates often argue that the revenue generated by the lottery is a necessary component of state budgets, and that without it there would be tax increases or cuts in other areas. In reality, however, this argument is not supported by evidence. In the US, a survey by Clotfelter and Cook showed that state lotteries do not appear to have much correlation with a state’s objective fiscal health. In fact, in most cases the lottery is winning popular approval precisely when it faces the prospect of tax increases or reductions.